Peter Schmeichel's ICON MOMENTS card is rated 93, he is 193cm | 6'4" tall, right-footed Denmark (GK)
that plays for
with Med/Med work rates.
His average user review rating is 3.8
out of 5 .
He has 3-star weak foot
and 2-star skill moves,
He does not have a real face in-game.
Peter Schmeichel has 3 special cards
with ratings between 86 and 93.
He was born on 18-11-1963.
His real-life stats are currently 0 goals and 0 assists in 0 matches in domestic competition. He also received 0 yellow cards and 0 red cards.
His current price on FUT is 330,000 on PlayStation,
600,000 on Xbox,
and 0 on PC.
I tend to go big on my goalkeepers, so I can't complain when a goal goes in that a lesser keeper couldn't save. I've tried all the big ones bar 95 Yashin and the Alisson team of the years, and have to say that daddy Schmeichel is the best Icon variant I've used. Breakdown below.
Diving: Fantastic, outside of Oblak, he has been the best goalkeeper for saving near post shots for me this season. It may just be a placebo, but his frame just fills the goal, and without adjusting, he is brilliant at saving those shots that would normally go in.
Reflexes: As above, he has made some excellent last ditch attempts to stop a goal. Couldn't really fault it.
Handling: I'm not sure he matches the 95 his card suggests, but it is good enough. Something that appears to affect the Icon keepers is his ability to hold the ball when under pressure, or jumping over the opposition players, and he is no exception. Not a major weakness though.
Speed: Fine, there are faster keepers out there, but he was much more responsive then Yashin and Lehman, although not as quick as Edwin, and some standard keeper like Alisson or Ter Stegen.
Positioning: For the most part, great, although I found most goals I conceded were from finesse shots. I'm not sure whether I am correlating something that isn't there, but it felt like he was just enough in a strange position that he wouldn't get to them as expected.
Kicking: By far the biggest attribute this card has, and the reason I left it last. He has the best kicking I have used bar maybe Ter Stegen and Neuer. His throws are accurate and long, and his kicking can hit those corners of the oppositions final third like you would want to when playing out from the back. The main plus point between this card, and the other Icon goalkeepers in my opinion.
In conclusion, are there better value for money goalkeepers? Yes. If you don't need an Icon in goal, then he probably isn't worth the coinage. However, for me, he ticks that spot that the other Icon keepers didn't, combining all the attributes I was after, with fantastic kicking. It is why he ended up with a game winning assist. And for that alone, I can't say he has not been worth it.
very interesting... i used 93 Peter with PSG defence, marquinhos and silva. Now i have 91 Stegen with 86 militao and 89 ramos. Stegen is better .i dont know why only 89 Van der sar looking best of the icon keepers.
Peter has great reflexes.I remember him in real life.He is one of the best keepers in football history. But he doenst look like best keeper in game.
We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful.
So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your
content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be
published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove
content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or
repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional
cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.
Now, onto the rules…
No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its
users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually
oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the
reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the
person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of
anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is
for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If
you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own
words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion
of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include
links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING
YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when
writing your comments.