Accessibility
Home
Players
Evolutions
Squad Builder
SBCs
Draft
Squads
Market
News
Packs
Objectives
Token Tracker
More
Language
Platform
Theme
EA Tax Calculator

Player Review

85 - IF
5.0
Pleasantly surprised
By kabamaru81, 12-10-2023

I was using a serie A team with Oshimen up top, and I also had Bellingham and Courtois undreatable, until magically I packed VVD as well. Trying to hybrid 3 leages wasn't easy for me so I started searching for a EPL/Real Hybrid. I tried also Haaland, but while he was very good, the 300K coins were just not justified in the pitch. He definitely was not 10 times better than Osimhen


Looking around in EPL strikers I ended in IF Watkins. He seemed very close in stats with Osimhen, and he is a featured IF. Meaning he is actually a better card vs what 85 rated indicates. He is 86 rated without any chemistry style/90 rated with Hawk/Hunter. I use Hunter

He is both fast/agile and he moves around the pitch. In the agility dpt he is better than both Haaland and Osimhen

He doesn't need to be replaced during game, as he has amazing stamina and relentless playstyle

He makes very decent runs, and has decent pass to create for teammates as well

He is the best striker in EPL for less than 100K by a mile

His 4 wf is a much noticable difference vs Haaland

His acceleration is not as great, this is why I used Hunter, I felt it was more important to fix the acceleration, rather then the strength which is already 80


Considering he is 1.80 he is not much of a threat in crosses. However he has both heading accuracy and jumping above 90


He doesn't have any other super playstyles. I would love him having the technical sprint as well, however I use it even without the trait


80K is still a lot of coins considering Osimhen is 30K. This is Prem/English Tax. However since he will be out of packs, his price will devaluate slower

Formation: 4231-2
Position: ST
Games: 17
GPG: 1.06
APG: 0.35
5.0
Overall
4.5
Value
4.0
GC
5.0
Stamina
Pace (9/10)
Shooting (9/10)
Passing (7/10)
Dribbling (8/10)
Defending (5/10)
Physicality (8/10)
See All reviews...
Top Rated
New
Controversial
Show comments