Player Review
83 - Normal
I used him for 148 games. Was he good?
PACE
Outstanding. He was lightning quick, especially with an anchor. Absolute beast.
SHOOTING
For a RB, it was great. He got 4 goals in the games I played with him, which was good. But then again, he's a RB, so he won't exactly get into goal-scoring positions often.
PASSING
He got 14 assists in those games, and again it was good.
DRIBBLING
At this point, your thought is probably "Is he bad at anything?", and so far, no.His dribbling was once again great and he could skim defenders with ease.
DEFENDING
THIS is why he's a huge letdown. Half the time he would be rooted to the spot, and most tackles/interceptions would be bad or result in something bad.
PHYSICAL
This was OK. He wasn't that strong, but did the job when it came to bullying his opponents.
MISCELLANEOUS
His work-rates were great for a RB, his height was solid, his stamina was great, but his weak foot wasn't that good, but what do you expect from a 2 star?
OVERALL
Kyle Walker...is he good?
To be honest, he's way too inconsistent to tell. For the first 10-ish games he was decent. Then for the next 80 or so, he was the best RB in the game. But all good things must come to an end. The last 50 games weren't so good. He was back to that decent run of form for a while, then he was bad, then good, then decent again. And the last 15 games especially, he was at his worst.He would be better at a wing back IMO, so if you play 5 back i'd give him a try.
Pace.
Attacking stats.
Passing and Dribbling.
ANYTHING to do with defending (except physical which is meh, but that can still count as a con).