Player Review

92 - TOTS

1.0

Not 92 worthy

By DingNast, 09-08-2018

Unpacked this card from an SBC and was intrigued. The player I can compare him to the most is Giroud. A tall physical strike target man with little agility or dribbling technique. I read the review that said he has powerful long range shooting which would be good since he likes to stay on the edge of the box for some reason (eventhough I have the instructions set for him to be forward, into box for crosses, press back line etc) but I couldn't sink any in back of the net. You would also think with the physical specimen he is that he would be able to win balls back from defenders after getting dispossessed but this is not the case. And bc je is so slow he can't run them down when they accelerate away either. Where he really excels is on Corners as a target man. He has great instincts to find the crease and bc of his size he out jump just about anyone. This does not make him worth a 92 or even close though. He's more like a 82. I'm trying to sell him on the market for 22k but I might just accept the quick sell for 20k as no one (rightfully) seems like they're willing to pay for him.

Apt target man
Shooting power
Huge threat on set pieces in the box

Slow/prodding
Lacking agility
Not 92 level
Wouldn't pay more than 8k for him

Formation: 343

Position: ST

Games: 5

GPG: 0.20

APG: 0.20

1.0

Overall

1.0

Value

1.0

Stamina

Pace (3/10)

Shooting (7/10)

Passing (3/10)

Dribbling (4/10)

Defending (5/10)

Physicality (8/10)

See All reviews...

Other Karl Toko-Ekambi Reviews

Karl Toko-Ekambi

The Cheap Beast

As there is still no review, I quickly want to state my opinion on this card. I bought him as an investment when he was 23k. I built a team around some of the Ligue 1 TOTS cards and noticed that he was absolutely banging goals for my team in Squad Battles on legendary difficulty. So I started to use him in online friendlies as well to do the weekly objectives and he nearly scored everything. His shooting is sublime, he hits...

Read full review

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.