Accessibility
Home
Players
Evolutions
Squad Builder
SBCs
Draft
Squads
Market
News
Packs
Objectives
Token Tracker
More
Language
Platform
Theme
EA Tax Calculator

Reviews

84 - IF
4.0
Surprisingly Good!
By aadarxx, 18-02-2018

Got this guy in an Untradeable TOTW SBC. Modified into RW and used Hawk on him. In the first match , which I won 1-0 , he assisted the winning goal in a spectacular way , rouletting around the opponent and passing directly to the front of the striker. His long passing is not good at all. He was able to outmuscle almost 80% of the defenders in the 10 matches I played. All in all , a good bargain for 20k , but not the greatest.

Pace

Positioning

Physicality

Long Passing

Aggression

Missed some good chances

Formation: 433-2
Position: RW
Games: 12
GPG: 0.42
APG: 0.33
4.0
Overall
4.0
Value
3.5
GC
3.5
Stamina
Pace (9/10)
Shooting (9/10)
Passing (7/10)
Dribbling (7/10)
Defending (3/10)
Physicality (8/10)
3.0
Not an impact player
By GBeskow, 19-02-2018

I bought him to replace Cuadrado at RM who i had for over 300 matches. Both look and play in a very similar way which i don't think is a good thing since he costs 10x more than Cuadrado but he has some qualities.


Pace: I used a Hunter chem, so Pace is good, he'll beat defenders and move fast, although he looked a little stiif while running. Can struggle against players with better or similar pace and will struggle vs players with better physical.


Shooting: It was an issue as a few times i cut to the middle and had a good chance but missed due to his 3* Weak Foot, tbh it looked like 1* Weak Foot, so the times when that happened again, i saw myself forced to bring the ball to his strong foot which allowed the defense to close the space. Finishing skills are fine, nothing spectacular but not the guy you'll look as a primary target.


Passing and Dribbling: Good. As i said before he looked a little stiff so dribbling seemed a little slow but not a major concern. And i have to mention the free kick skills, 84/83 (FK/Curve) was enough to score a beautiful goal on a curved kick.


Defense: Not bad despite the very low rating, of course he's not a prime defender but he can help and start counters.


Physical: His Stamina was close to red after 65-70 minutes into the game, then he was useless and that was a huge issue for me, even when he has 86 Stamina. And also lacks strength and jumping, so this are is a major issue.


Overall i don't think he's worth ~20k, imo there are cheaper players that will deliver the same or better results and he was far from being an impact player, during the 15 games tenure he had good moments but he was a player that needed multiple chances to deliver. His stats look good but it didn't translated well into a game.

Pace

Free Kicks

Defense

Passing and Dribbling

Physical

3* Weak Foot looks more as 1* star

Headers

Not an impact player

Formation: 3421
Position: RM
Games: 15
GPG: 0.20
APG: 0.00
3.0
Overall
2.0
Value
1.5
GC
1.5
Stamina
Pace (8/10)
Shooting (7/10)
Passing (8/10)
Dribbling (7/10)
Defending (5/10)
Physicality (3/10)
5.0
Federico Bernardeschi
By Materazzi, 17-02-2018

The best at his post behind Dybala on calcio A ! I recommend ! Before i have used Cuadrado but it is really better ! it's also the best Italian at this post !!! I used Bernardeschi IF on 4/2/3/1


Verry good Long Shots ! little advice ... shooting outside the surface

Agility, Balance, Reactions, Ball Control, Dribbling, Composure are good ! He is a good dribbler ! I have 4 stars skills !

Short Passing are verry good and Long Passing is not bad. His passing delivers a real goal opportunity

Good Crossing i used Icardi boost stricker and with Bernardesch's Crossing Icardi scored a lot of goal with Icardi's header

Strength

He can't score with head

it is slightly lacking in speed (put a chem style and this defect will settle)

W.Foot 3 stars

Formation: 4231-2
Position: RM
Games: 10
GPG: 0.90
APG: 1.30
5.0
Overall
5.0
Value
4.5
GC
5.0
Stamina
Pace (8/10)
Shooting (10/10)
Passing (10/10)
Dribbling (9/10)
Defending (5/10)
Physicality (4/10)