Player Review

99 - TOTS

4.5

TOTS VVD recommendation

By P4ULINH0, 12-05-2020

TOTS VVD

Even though I give him 5 Stars I just can't recommend him.

He is definitely not worth the price.

Just don't spend this much for a CB. Most players don't even touch their CBs and defend with their CDMs.

KI / computer postions them nearly perfect whether it's 80 Joe Gomez or 99 VVD.

Also when gameplay is fu up or EA wants your opponent to score in 45++++++++++.

Just barely matters

Not relevant part

Spains way of playing / TikiTaka always inspired me the most. I'm still using Iniesta(FB), despite his stamina, because it's fun playing with him weather I lose or win.

-> In first place I play for the fun (between 11-17 in WL depends on joy, accordingly I've not played once all 30 games)

Suddenly the PackLuck hit me. Red VVD.

Ramos(gold)/Ter Stegen(gold) left, the big Dutchman and Alisson (TOTS) came.

After playing some games, joy turned into a big disappointmant.

I barely noticed any difference (Biggest: Alisson TOTS is worse than Ter Stegen, not surprisingly).

Obviously my expactations were way to high.

After last WL I have to say he's good. But just not 99 Rated good.

Honestly the only difference I really noticed in relation to 86 Hierro is the Passing. Whether short or long, they're on spot and with unreal power.

Every other Stat is way better as well, but just not noticable.

Perhaps I'm a bad FIFA player, but there are 2 bad reviews as well.

In a nutshell

Still I haven't figured out how FIFA works.

If the gameplay is fu up, VVD is fu up too (even dwarfs will push him away). If not, I score and don't care.

I guess thats the main point I haven't noticed any difference to Ramos or Hierro.

But you just can't give him less than 5 Stars.

Only ''bad thing'' is his size. Pointless ->CB. Every big player does not move as smooth and fast as a dwarf, so does he.

And not very surprisingly: barely scores headers.

best regards

just another disappointed average Joe

I'm not a native speaker, I don't reread looking for mistakes, perhaps I'm even stupid. Pointless.

I never thought of writing a Review caus the community is even worse than the game itself.

But I also never thought of having PackLuck.

Stats

ea randomly gives or takes wheather you playing VVD TOTS or Joe Gomez gold

Formation: 4231

Position: CB

Games: 25

GPG: 0.04

APG: 0.04

4.5

Overall

0.5

Value

4.0

5.0

Stamina

Pace (8/10)

Shooting (6/10)

Passing (10/10)

Dribbling (7/10)

Defending (9/10)

Physicality (8/10)

See All reviews...

Other Virgil van Dijk Reviews

Virgil van Dijk

Great Wall of Holland

I decided to replace my Ramos with VVD before this weekend league. Besides Varane it was an absolute monster and a major upgrade. While Ramos lost too many 50-50 duels and the attackers always stumbled through the defense, VVD won every duel and didn't let anyone pass. At first I had some problems with his positioning, but as soon as I knew how to play with him, he was an absolute game changer. Also, I could finally get dan...

Read full review

Virgil van Dijk

Van Dijk Toty Unstoppable

I was so lucky to get him in my PL upgrade pack and i have played him as a CB and striker for fun and he can play bothNo one can get past him and he can out pace anyone

Read full review

Virgil van Dijk

The Dictionary Image of "Tank"

This card is undoubtedly the best/scariest player to see in a back line. I don't even know where to start. It almost feels like he wins possession by getting within arms reach, sometimes without me pressing tackle. His best stat however is his strength. Get near this guy and you are getting shoved away from the ball. I often find myself swapping him to cdm in game and he still impacts the game there too. You could very well...

Read full review

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.