Accessibility
Home
Players
Evolutions
Squad Builder
SBCs
Draft
Squads
Market
News
Packs
Objectives
Token Tracker
More
Language
Platform
Theme
EA Tax Calculator

Reviews

91 - PL POTM SBC
2.5
and the point is?..
By LJPAFC, 11-07-2020

ok before we begin i want to make some things absolutely clear.


I've already got 94 and 92 Summer Heat Fernandes, i did them for the sole purpose of being used as SBC fodder (because he's not better than headliner James Maddison as a Cam in my prem team) so i was waiting for the perfect sbc to come along to put them in - and here it is!

I used the 94 and 92 in each of the 84 squads required for this POTM, making it significantly cheaper, so i only needed to buy 84's around it, so it came to about 120k, which is a bargain if i do say my myself! So I've got myself a 91 rated fodder card with prem and Portuguese links for around 120k, and i only had to sacrifice a 94 and 92, respectively. i might use this 91 as fodder for the 82 squad for Divock Origi, but that had me thinking... is Divock Origi better than player moments Josh King?.... no, probably not, so ive come to conclusion that I'm going to put him in an icon sbc, I'll update everyone on that.?)>>)

Links to baby Deco and Harry Maguire in my past and present Leicester team! also links to flashback Quaresma at right back. (don't ask)

my account management... if anyone wants to tell me how i could have handled this whole Fernandes situation better , let me know in the comments of the card, ill get around to reading them.

DOESNT LINK TO LEV YASHIN. i was so disappointed when i discovered this. I've had baby Yashin ever since i packed him from a baby icon pack, and i realised i can't link him to Fernandes.... i can counter this by playing Fernandes as a CDM at CB, thats the only way i can see this working, to get the weak link for teams, as he is my favourite goalkeeper in the game ok.

Formation: 532
Position: CDM
Games: 0
GPG: nan
APG: nan
2.5
Overall
4.5
Value
1.5
GC
5.0
Stamina
Pace (7/10)
Shooting (8/10)
Passing (9/10)
Dribbling (8/10)
Defending (3/10)
Physicality (6/10)