Player Review

88 - Icon

1.0

Worst Icon I have ever used

By michaelm96, 14-01-2021

I've done two Icon SBCs and was "lucky" enough to pack this man on my second (Mid Seedorf was the first). I'm a Gold 1/2 WL kind of guy, so he wasn't going anywhere near the WL squad, but I thought I'd give him a shot in the newest set of Icon objectives. What better place to try him out than in the One Nation friendlies with an England squad? But my god, was he bad. Of course, you probably already assumed this from the stats, but he is slowwwww. I lined him up as the attacking CM in a 4-4-2, and he made 0 impact in any of the games. He literally turns like a truck. I think 86 John Stones was handling the ball better in-game. He was essentially unusable in the attacking third and around the box, which is a shame since I would have liked to test his shot more than I had the chance to. Look elsewhere if you're trying to find an Icon to round out your squad.

Passing was alright I guess

Made some plays on defense, and physicality showed occasionally, but not going to keep up with anyone

Pace

Atrocious dribbling

Formation: 442

Position: CM

Games: 10

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.00

1.0

Overall

1.0

Value

1.0

3.0

Stamina

Pace (1/10)

Shooting (5/10)

Passing (7/10)

Dribbling (1/10)

Defending (6/10)

Physicality (7/10)

See All reviews...

Other Frank Lampard Reviews

Frank Lampard

Stop the Mid Lampard Hate!

When the Rooney SBC came out, I needed a way to get him in my squad (on full chem cause having him on 7 would annoy me lol). I already had two links into Walker and Stones, and so just needed a final strong link for my 10 chem dream. Obviously I wasn't going to choose a Championship player, so on my poor 250k budget I looked into the English Icons - there he was, my lord and saviour Mid Frank Lampard. Deciding to ignore the...

Read full review

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.