Accessibility
Home
Players
Evolutions
Squad Builder
SBCs
Draft
Squads
Market
News
Packs
Objectives
Token Tracker
More
Language
Platform
Theme
EA Tax Calculator

Reviews

89 - TOTS
0.5
FODDER, but good dynamic image
By Knowles04, 31-05-2021

used him in my weekend league team as a test and to link up my french Ligue midfield of Sanches, Bruno G and aouar. with boulaya at CAM whilst my midfield is amazing and I'm happy with them I normally use a formation without wingers but now with the new Brazilian lb I packed (ciao H) I can use showdown neres (linking with Bruno G) at lm so I needed an RM I tried him in 6 games, for the next 24 he was subbed off 2nd minute. he is too big and his body type means dribbling with him is so bad. I also put a engine on him. didn't help at all. (also EA where is the atal tots pls)

save the 30k coins and go for diatta for around 70k. i used him at ST and subbed on tots vardy.

links

position although his two competitors in the position, diatta and atal are both better buy a long way.

half-decent shot. good for shooting at the keeper and getting a corner he can be subbed off. he did finish one thou.

dynamic image

fat

cant dribble

no pace

doesn't have the right feel.

3*3*

Formation: 442-2
Position: ST
Games: 6
GPG: 0.17
APG: 0.33
0.5
Overall
2.0
Value
0.5
GC
1.5
Stamina
Pace (2/10)
Shooting (4/10)
Passing (3/10)
Dribbling (1/10)
Defending (3/10)
Physicality (5/10)
3.5
he's GOOD FODDER
By OkochaFan28, 13-06-2021

WHEN I SAW THE LIGUE 1 TOTS, THERE WAS QUITE A LOT OF CARDS THAT I WANTED TO TRY. ONE OF THEM WAS LABORDE, BECAUSE HE HAD SOME DECENT STATS. I AM A DIV 3 PLAYER AND PLAYED ALL MY GAMES WITH LABORDE IN DIV RIVALS.


SHOOTING: HE WAS DECENT AT SHORT/MEDIUM RANGE, BUT HIS LONG SHOTS WERE TRASH. HIS FINESSE SHOTS IN PARTICULAR WERE VERY GOOD AND EVERY TIME I HAD A SHOT WITH HIM, IT WAS ABOUT 65% CHANCE IT WAS GOING IN.


PACE: HE WAS RELATIVELY FAST, BUT IT DIDN'T FEEL LIKE 90 PACE.MAYBE IT WAS HIS BODY TYPE, BUT HIS PACE FELT ABOUT 85.


DRIBBLING: UNFORTUNATELY HIS DRIBBLING WAS TERRIBLE. HIS BODY TYPE MADE HIS AGILITY AND BALANCE FEEL A LOT WORSE THAN THEY SHOULD BE. I TRIED EVERY CHEM STYLE I COULD THINK OF BUT NOTHING MADE IT BETTER.


PHYSICAL: HIS STRENGTH ON THE BALL WAS GOOD. HE HELD DEFENDERS OFF WELL. HOWEVER, THE BEST STAT FOR HIS PHYSICAL (AND THE WHOLE CARD) IS HIS HEADING. WITH HIS JUMPING 99 AND HIS HEADING ACCURACY 99, THE HEADING IS GODLY. EVERYTIME I TOOK A CORNER, LABORDE WOULD SCORE OR HEAD IT ON TARGET.

HEADING


FINESSE SHOT


JUMPING


STREGNTH

DRIBBLING


LONG SHOTS


3 STAR SKILL MOVES


3 STAR WEAK FOOT


PACE

Formation: 433
Position: RW
Games: 15
GPG: 0.33
APG: 0.47
3.5
Overall
4.0
Value
2.5
GC
4.0
Stamina
Pace (6/10)
Shooting (8/10)
Passing (7/10)
Dribbling (4/10)
Defending (1/10)
Physicality (10/10)