Reviews

82 - Rare

4.0

Why did I do this?

By ZackkFairr, 26-04-2021

So I am reviewing a bunch of Arsenal players after an april WL with an arsenal team, like the melon I am.

However, I needed to use pepe on the LM, I decided better him then use inform Saka off chem or base Saka. I couldn't afford one of the bigger versions either unfortunately. But he was actually pretty good.

As he is pretty close to the meta I will review him as such.

Pace - Even on 7 chem he is pretty fast. Not lightening but good.

Shooting - As long as you use his left his shooting is good.

Passing - His short passing is good, his crosses are not great though. Maybe that is the chem at fault.

Dribbling - Not as good as I had expected. Especially considering I had an engine on him. But still pretty good even vs the top players available.

Cost - At 1.5k he is great should you need to fill a spot on left or right. Though if you do want him left better play an alternative on full chem.

Stamina - He is tired in extra time for sure. But he can still make a difference.

Weak foot - this lets him down. He did score one on his right but I wanted him to use his left. Pure luck.

Defending - I have LM help with defence, he isn't as good as others with this. But the best thing I had.

Formation: 4231-2

Position: LM

Games: 41

GPG: 0.24

APG: 0.34

4.0

Overall

4.5

Value

3.5

Stamina

Pace (9/10)

Shooting (8/10)

Passing (7/10)

Dribbling (8/10)

Defending (3/10)

Physicality (5/10)

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.