Player Review

94 - TOTS

4.0

Better Than Expected

By Dembelbae, 20-05-2018

I am a huge Dortmund fan, so when TOTS Bundesliga came out I was ecstatic. Today I opened the TOTS guarantee pack and before I thought, "okay the only players I don't want are Peterson, the goalkeepers (cause Fahrman is a beast), and anyone I can already afford (under 100K). Well, I saw the German flag, freaked out cause I thought it was Marco Reus, then I saw the ST position so I was expecting Gnabry which would be cool as well, and the I saw 94 and though, "oh kill me now". I mean, 2 star Skill Moves, low pace, and not even great passing... what is there to want. But I decided to use him in my team, and I was still very upset when the match started. His first game was fantastic. He scored a hatrick and the keeper was doing an amazing job to keep him from scoring more. I was still pretty pissed that I got him and thought it was just the opponent playing terrible defense. The next game he got two goals. So now I'm thinking either he's had a few really lucky games or he's actually very good. After 7 games he's score 11 goals and had 4 assists, which is nowhere near bad, especially considering his price tag. I am now going to replace him for Divok Origi and he's linking well with Batshuayi. His card has a unique feel to it. I think you need to use it in a two striker formation, because he creates amazing chances, but only when you don't try to force him through. He is mostly clinical and his physicality and passing are solid on a Catalyst chem style, but I think what really separates him is his positioning. Also, he is only really great in transition, because he has such crappy skill moves. He doesn't feel like an amazing card, but he is. I guess he's kinda similar to Muller. I would still prefer to have packed someone else, because the TOTS is just unbelievable and I can't trade him, but I mean, if I were to have, like, 150K to spend on a player, I would spend it on him and keep 60K for something else. I'm giving him a 8/10

Shooting

Ball Control

Physicality

Heading

Ball Pressure

Positioning

Short Pass

Agility

Weak Foot

Height

Hybridization

Uniqueness

SKILL MOVES

Can't hold off defenders as well as he should when standing still

Still misses more opportunities than he should

Through Balls

Formation: 352

Position: ST

Games: 7

GPG: 1.57

APG: 0.57

4.0

Overall

4.5

Value

3.5

4.5

Stamina

Pace (8/10)

Shooting (9/10)

Passing (7/10)

Dribbling (7/10)

Defending (4/10)

Physicality (9/10)

See All reviews...

Other Nils Petersen Reviews

Nils Petersen

Nils Petersen Honest Review

Oh the joy of these Guaranteed TOTS Packs, the hype of who your new club talisman to carry your team to victory could be. You have a peek on Social Media to see who people are getting, Lewandowski, Reus Goretzka. And you believe you can pull one of these greats. Fingers crossed you open the pack, Pavlenka, Sane, Gregoritsch. We've all been there and the reason why you're reading this review is because you got Petersen.

Read full review

Nils Petersen

Poor Mans Kane

I bought him for 125k and what a player.He has similiar stats to Kane.Excellent Heading,finishing (composure 99, Finishing 99 Shot Power 99 attacking Position 99).Has also 5* weak foot and can shoot anything in the net within the box right foot left foot it doesnt matter.His passing isnt brilliant or his pace but with Cat Chem 93 Pace and 87 passing.Used with a fast s...

Read full review

Nils Petersen

Tank

I've been using this player ever since he was released alongside Ronaldinho and either Crespo or Uth as my CAM in a 41212(2). Mind you I have not used him in a lone striker position, and I do not intend to do so in the future. This player needs to be surrounded by fast, agile players who can run past defenders and deliver accurate passes to this striker. That's the word that really suits him the most - striker. His only pur...

Read full review

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.