Reviews

93 - TOTS

2.0

Can't find a worse keeper than him!

By maxmonefeldt, 02-05-2018

I got him in the SBC so he is untradeble, but i tried to use him in the DKT for 3 times in a row. In every game the opponent had around 5 or 6 shots, and he let 3 or 4 of them in every game. That is just awful.

He is big, so he can take some of the long shots, but i'd rather say no!

He takes nothing.

1v1: he loses every time.

Longshots: He takes a few

Second balls: He gives too many rebounds, and that isn't good in that level of a keeper.

Formation: 433-2

Position: GK

Games: 15

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.00

2.0

Overall

2.5

Value

2.5

Stamina

Pace (5/10)

Shooting (5/10)

Passing (5/10)

Dribbling (5/10)

Defending (5/10)

Physicality (5/10)

0.5

Cant wait to recycle him on Sunday

By Kevro53, 18-05-2018

I do not have the words to express how god awful this card is. I have played him for 10 games now, about half and half Div 2 and Legendary Squad battles. I can't recall him making a single save so far. 93 rated and 11 ratings lower Begovic is a god in comparison. Your days are numbered Oblak I can not wait to burn you in the Bundesliga SBC come Sunday.

Kicking is pretty good.
93 Rated for SBC's

Reacts to longs shots about 2 seconds after they hit the back of the net.
Physically can not save low driven shots
Feebly just sticks a hand out for most shot choices and doesn't come close to saving them.

Formation: 4222

Position: GK

Games: 10

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.00

0.5

Overall

1.0

Value

1.0

4.0

Stamina

Pace (1/10)

Shooting (1/10)

Passing (5/10)

Dribbling (1/10)

Defending (1/10)

Physicality (1/10)

4.0

Surprisingly Solid!

By SquagglyCat, 08-07-2018

Expected him to suck after reading reviews and using all sorts of goalies who turned out to be trash. Have played 9 games so far with him and he's been truly great! I believe I started with a "cat" chem style which turned into "glove" and now "wall". Although the first couple chem styles sucked, wall seems to be the one for him. Yes, I am biased as an Atletico fan (as you can probably see from the squad), but this only made me hope he would be viable, which he absolutely has been.

Not too short

Great reflexes

Easy to link

Not too pricy

Not De Gea quality although more pricy

Beat by ground shots

Formation: 41212

Position: GK

Games: 9

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.00

4.0

Overall

4.0

Value

4.5

5.0

Stamina

Pace (5/10)

Shooting (5/10)

Passing (5/10)

Dribbling (5/10)

Defending (5/10)

Physicality (5/10)

1.0

Too many pros and cons

By Romarito, 02-05-2018

For the price you are paying ( about 150K ) he is not worth the price. He is a good GK in a 1v1 situation and he often defends those annoying low driven shots but he is very bad at long range shots and for some reason he cant come out for crosses very well, especially corners.

Can defend low driven shots.

Good at 1v1

Height

Price

Cant defend long shots

Coming out for crosses

Formation: 41212-2

Position: GK

Games: 0

GPG: nan

APG: nan

1.0

Overall

1.0

Value

1.0

Stamina

Pace (5/10)

Shooting (5/10)

Passing (5/10)

Dribbling (5/10)

Defending (5/10)

Physicality (5/10)

0.5

Quick review

By vonsky104, 15-05-2018

For the love of God, DON'T - I repeat - DO NOT EVER buy this guy. He is really, really one of the worst keepers I have ever played with. If there's one player I can compare him to, is - Prime Yashin. BUT he is worse than him...

The only use for him is Icon SBCs and TOTS sbcs.

The best keeper to use in La Liga TOTS SBC

The best keeper to use in Icons SBC

....

... price..?

I have chars limit...

Formation: 4222

Position: GK

Games: 10

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.00

0.5

Overall

0.5

Value

0.5

Stamina

Pace (1/10)

Shooting (1/10)

Passing (1/10)

Dribbling (1/10)

Defending (1/10)

Physicality (1/10)

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.