Player Review

86 - Player Moments SBC

2.5

Not for me

By Michealsissoko, 05-01-2021

i used him 5 rivals matches in division 1 and he is not that gos. i mean, he can defen, but he is not so strong, his passing is trash and he feels like he has 60 pace.. i'ld say buy normal van dijk is tradebel, anmd much better.

defending

links

strengt( ingame)

passing

dribbling

Formation: 4231

Position: CB

Games: 5

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.00

2.5

Overall

2.0

Value

1.0

4.0

Stamina

Pace (5/10)

Shooting (1/10)

Passing (3/10)

Dribbling (4/10)

Defending (8/10)

Physicality (6/10)

See All reviews...

Other John Stones Reviews

John Stones

Is it a good price?

For me it was a great card, yes, Joe Gomez is faster and cheaper, but I want him to defend, not to be my LW. And his pace isn’t bad at all, 150k isn’t so expensive and you can use fodders, I got him for 50k. And his passes and dribbling is great for a CENTRE-BACK. Plus it really nice to have a defender with 4* wf and 3 skills, something that most defenders don’t have, something to consider too is that he has great agi...

Read full review

John Stones

Surprisingly Good!

First time writing a review so here goes nothing. I had Joe Gomez (like everyone else) in the back and paired him up with Varane. Did Stones for free with all the untradeables I have prepared for TOTY so I didn't sacrifice a lot for him and didn't sacrifice much fodder. Obviously, Gomez and Varane are very meta, but I needed a change of scenery in the back and Gomez can never win aerial battles for me. Stones solved my prob...

Read full review

John Stones

john not stones john rock

I wanted to have a great partnership with raphael varane to be meta and great defensive stats and physicality and pace( END GAME PLAYER) 2 days ago I found that guy.John stonesHe is great in defending Great pace monster physicality also great passing. Just I can say ChEaP. you can find players better than him but not for this price. Him and varane are in same level in defensing and he never stop to wor...

Read full review

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.