Reviews

88 - Icon

4.5

Is Frank Rijkaard worth it?

By interursister, 23-11-2020

For this weekend league, I was able to afford mid-Frank Rijkaard using him left center back and right center back being Denayer rulebreakers in a 4-2-3-1, and on the face stats he looked brilliant and he felt relatively smooth on the ball and never really threw possession away so you could really see his composure and reactions come into play and was able to get me out of the most pressurized situation. For my playstyle, I like defenders who are comfortable on the ball and are not a liability when they have it so his passing was something I was really impressed with, and that 4-star weak foot made him be able to fiz a ball on ethier foot, He gave some really good passes into my midfield so I could progress forward. now most importantly his defending, obviously cutting passing lanes and shielding the ball as well as 1 on 1s he did exceptionally well and as he should but I could tell sometimes since his aggression was so low he wouldn't always tackle into the ball compared to someone like Kante he would sometimes do a sort of weak tackle leading to the ball not always be won. his body type was something that also stood out and is something that is very underrated for defenders so since he has a high average body type compared to the best one (in my opinion) lean sometimes when he shrugs people off the ball they still retain possession whitch can be a combined of low aggression and body type. As for corners being 6'2, I would think he would score many headers but he did not score a single header and he was even set at that front post he was just getting bullied on corners.

great interceptions

exceptional passing range

great composure and strength combination

the pace can keep up with most attackers

great jockeying

aggression

bad on corners

body type

Formation: 4231

Position: CB

Games: 62

GPG: 0.00

APG: 0.03

4.5

Overall

5.0

Value

3.0

4.5

Stamina

Pace (7/10)

Shooting (6/10)

Passing (8/10)

Dribbling (5/10)

Defending (9/10)

Physicality (8/10)

3.5

Frank.

By bruhneyneyjr1011, 13-02-2021

Im a div 1 player with 2100+ skill points. I played him left cb in a 4 back and as a central cb in a 5 back. Imo hes too slow even with a shadow on, he gets out paces by gold cr7. His turns are slow and is even worse in delayed gameplay. His jocking speed feels very similar to a vvd which is slow and clunky. He can put a strong tackle in tho and wins the ball back every time when you slide or stand tackle, his strength and height helps him with it so there wont be bs where you tackle the player and it bounces straight back to the opposition. His passing range is exceptional as a cb, very nice lofted through balls to the overlapping wing backs and his driven passes are pin point accurate with both feet. His one goal came from a corner, the ball was bouncing around the box and he half volleyed it with his left foot into the top bins.

Id say hes very similar to a van dijk with the slow turns but strong tackles. He feels a bit faster than van dijk and has a better passing range than him. Van dijk beats him in the air tho.

Overall, Id say hes not really worth the coins, I just have him for the links. I think joe gomez is a better cb just becuase of the pace as its so important this year.

Strong tackling
execellent passing
Good stamina
When the ball drops to him in the box he can hit them left foot or right foot

Slow pace
Slow turns

Formation: 352

Position: CB

Games: 38

GPG: 0.03

APG: 0.03

3.5

Overall

3.0

Value

2.0

5.0

Stamina

Pace (6/10)

Shooting (8/10)

Passing (9/10)

Dribbling (5/10)

Defending (9/10)

Physicality (9/10)

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.