Reviews

92 - TOTS SBC

5.0

Oh no, kent is back :(

By ReshirexOnYT, 22-05-2021

Other than the wf, this is litterely kent in every way - if you compare his stats to the 84 version last year lozano is just better in every way by a bit and plays exactly like kent ingame. His dribbling is absolutely mad however missing the 5* sm is always a shame with these kinds of card, but yeah the pace with the lean body type and 99 agility is absolutely unstoppable, and he can shoot like a god too. Links are a problem, but tbh ur gonna use him as a sub anyways. However he isn't really a super sub, he is a goal sub (like kent last year) - a sub that will guarantee you a goal in your game. He is super cheap for his stats (especially because his headliners was only like 30k less than this card and 4 ratings lower). I rate him a 9.7/10 as he is just missing that 1* on sm and wf, and could maybe do with being a little better for links and strength wise. 2 super rigged fut champs games and still got 4 goals (honestly SUPER rigged; I always find Friday the hardest and the most boring).

Pace

Positioning

Finishing and shot power

Crossing

Short passing

Agility

Ball control

Dribbling

Stamina

4* sm

4* wf

5'9" and Lean body type

H/L work rates

Strength

Long passing

Defending could be higher

Links (Mexico and Napoli)

Formation: 4231

Position: ST

Games: 2

GPG: 2.00

APG: 0.00

5.0

Overall

4.5

Value

5.0

Stamina

Pace (10/10)

Shooting (10/10)

Passing (9/10)

Dribbling (10/10)

Defending (6/10)

Physicality (8/10)

We want to ensure that user generated content published on our website is relevant and lawful. So, we have created these House Rules to give you an idea of things to avoid mentioning in your content and posts. Please read these rules carefully before you write anything that will be published on our website. Our website administrators will moderate content and may remove content that is in violation of these rules. Your account may also be suspended for serious or repeated violations. All decisions of our website administrators are final. In very exceptional cases, we may be legally compelled to reveal your account information to the authorities.

Now, onto the rules…

No swearing or offensive language. We want to keep our website engaging for all of its users and this kind of language could put people off using our website.
No comments that are unlawful, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
No spamming. Please don’t re-post content that is the same or similar to what you have already posted.
No defamatory content. This means no content that is untrue and likely to damage the reputation of another person or an organisation. You could face legal action from the person or organisation that you have defamed, and we don’t want that.
No personal information. Never publicise your own personal information or that of anyone else, such as full name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. This is for your own safety and the safety of everyone who uses our website.
Keep your content relevant. Please keep your content relevant to the topic at hand. If you post something that isn’t relevant, we might remove it.
Do not copy others. Please ensure that all content that you post is written in your own words and does not violate copyright laws.
Do not advertise or link to third party websites. We want to ensure that the promotion of any third party websites is endorsed by us, so please ensure that you do not include links in your content.
NO CAPS LOCK. IF YOU WRITE IN CAPS LOCK IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE RAISING YOUR VOICE. We can hear you just fine without caps lock, so please take it off when writing your comments.